By Edda West
The lockdown that Prime Minister Trudeau says will continue for another 18 months until a vaccine is available feels like a death sentence to a country already traumatized by fear of COVID-19. Piled onto this is the psychological trauma of lockdown, massive job losses, business closures and devastation to our economy that will change our lives forever.
On April 9, 2020 just before Easter, Trudeau announced
“We will not be coming back to our former normal situation; we can’t do that until we have developed a vaccine and that could take 12 to 18 months….. [and]….This will be the new normal until a vaccine is developed.”
The isolation and quarantine of healthy asymptomatic people, instead of those who are ill, symptomatic or have been exposed, is without precedent in public health history. It has turned epidemiological principles upside down. There is no scientific or historical basis for the lockdown. It’s primary basis is the Gates/WHO agenda pushing for extended lockdown to prevent the timely acquisition of broad ‘herd immunity’ so that the new coronavirus vaccine can be forced on everyone.
Trudeau’s statement is a script lifted straight out of Bill Gates’ playbook, eerily echoing almost word for word the message Gates has been pushing since the coronavirus epidemic took off in North America earlier this winter. The April 9th Highwire video clip at 2:07 captures Gates stating,
“Things won’t go back to truly normal until we have a vaccine that we’ve gotten out basically to the entire world.”
Instead of following the recommendations of leading scientists, doctors and epidemiologists, Trudeau is foisting the Gates/WHO globalist agenda on us which he must certainly know will result in financial ruin for millions of Canadians. Why is the Trudeau government ignoring the advice of Canada’s own experienced doctors and scientists who have spoken out against the draconian lockdown policies? Former provincial chief public health officers like Dr. Richard Schabas and Joel Kettner have stated clearly that the ‘numbers’ do NOT exceed the expected hospitalizations and deaths from seasonal respiratory viruses and do NOT justify the lockdown.
As pointed out in a previous article, doctors in Europe and the USA are using effective treatments proven to mitigate the effects of covid 19 that are saving lives. David Brownstein MD has been treating patients with various ‘alternative’ protocols including IV vitamin C and hydroxychloroquine. His blog posts provide details of treatments.
It’s already been established that the vast majority of people who are exposed to covid-19 will have mild flu-like symptoms, will recover, and will develop natural immunity that then protects their contacts and community at large. Only a small minority are at risk. These are the same vulnerable people at risk during any other ‘normal’ flu season. The majority of the overall healthy population is NOT at high risk from covid-19.
The single most significant factor driving the intense fear is that the medical system has no ‘approved’ treatment other than ventilators to manage the illness in severely affected people. Ventilators, a risky treatment can increase death in covid-19 patients, while alternative life-saving ‘off label’ treatment protocols are being denied sick patients, even forbidden as optional treatment protocols.
The question everyone should be asking is, why does the Canadian medical system refuse to provide effective ‘off label’ treatments to critically ill patients? What have they got to lose? Does the ‘system’ prefer people die rather than try effective alternate treatment protocols that are saving lives – IV vitamin C and hydroxychloroquine protocols? By refusing to allow patients access to ‘off label’ treatments that work, our medical system prolongs the lockdown while bolstering the pervasive fear and helplessness that now grips the population.
Covid-19 cases and deaths in Canada
On April 17, there were 20,074 active cases of covid-19 according to WorldOmeter. Of these, 19,517 or 97% are mild cases. 557 or 3% are serious enough to need hospitalization. From the start of the pandemic, of the 11,853 closed cases, 89% (10,543) have recovered or were discharged if hospitalized, while 11% or 1,310 seriously ill patients have died.
The population of Canada was 37,673,867 on April 17, and according to WorldOmeter, the reported cases of Covid-19 on that day was 31,927. The prevalence of Covid-19 (Number of Cases as a percent of Population) was 0.09%. According to IPAC (Infection Prevention & Control Canada) on April 4 there were 42,475 cases of Influenza A & B. Therefore the Prevalence of Influenza was 0.1%. As can be seen, Covid-19 was a bit smaller (but comparable) prevalence in the population as Influenza.
In a recent statement, federal Chief public health officer Dr. Theresa Tam said that close to half of the fatalities are in long-term care homes where outbreaks are “driving the severe outcomes in Canada…..[and]…..That is absolutely a key feature of this epidemic.” This is no different than all seasonal influenza epidemics. So why aren’t effective disease protection, mitigation and proper staffing of long term care facilities in place rather than locking down the whole population?
Is prolonged lockdown a specific strategy to force society to accept vaccine mandates?
Prolonged lockdown prevents the timely development of natural ‘herd immunity’ in the society. It ensures that the epidemic will drag on for many months causing recurring outbreaks that will result in more deaths in the long run. There is no epidemiological or scientific basis that justifies such extreme measures.
Sweden’s top epidemiologist, Professor Johan Giesecke, also the first Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and an advisor to the director general of the WHO says that the Imperial College paper the lockdown was based on, which many countries followed, “was very much too pessimistic” and is not evidence-based.
- Any such models are a dubious basis for public policy
- The correct policy is to protect the old and the frail only
- This will eventually lead to herd immunity as a “by-product”
- The flattening of the curve is due to the most vulnerable dying first as much as the lockdown
- The results will eventually be similar for all countries
- Covid-19 is a “mild disease” and similar to the flu, and it was the novelty of the disease that scared people.
- The actual fatality rate of Covid-19 is the region of 0.1%
Experts are warning that lockdown measures don’t work and are dangerous to societal health when imposed long term. Allowing the population to gain natural herd immunity is essential to stopping the transmission of the disease quickly and is what will protect the vulnerable. They are the ones needing protection and isolation while providing them with all the daily support services and medical care they need.
Another brave scientist challenges the ‘party line’
Professor Knut Wittkowski, long time epidemiologist and mathematician says lockdown is a grave mistake. Having tracked and analyzed many epidemics in his 35 year career, he doesn’t see COVID-19 as much different from any other respiratory viruses that have come around. In this enlightening interview, he says, “We are experiencing all sorts of counterproductive consequences of a not well-thought-through policy.”
He says that ‘flattening the curve’ widens it and prolongs the epidemic so it takes more time and that there’s no good reason for the disease to linger in the population longer than necessary. Furthermore, Wittkowski explains,
“With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity. About 80% of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected, or they had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children. So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible.”
Professor Wittkowski concurs with other concerned scientists who’ve spoken out against containment and lockdown policies, saying it’s unreasonable to sacrifice the entire social, emotional and financial health of the entire population. Rather, we must increase protective measures for the vulnerable. Such drastic measures will be much more damaging in the long run. It’s a case of ‘the cure is worse than the disease’ and will, in the end, increase the risk to the vulnerable. He says,
“…….. we will see more cases among the elderly, because we have prevented the school children from creating herd immunity.”
Drastically curbing the trajectory of the virus prevents the timely acquisition of natural ‘herd immunity’ in the population which is needed to end the pandemic.
“That is the downside of starting containment. We should not believe that we are more intelligent than Mother Nature was when we were evolving. Mother Nature was pretty good at making sure that we’re a good match for the disease that we happen to see virtually every year.”
Professor Wittkowski warns that artificially suppressing the virus among low risk people like schoolchildren and their parents may “increase the number of new infections” as it keeps the virus circulating much longer than it normally would. Closing schools is a terrible idea as children are not severely affected by the virus and should be allowed to be exposed to it and develop natural immunity which will benefit all of society.
“On the other hand, children do very well with these diseases. They’re evolutionarily designed to be exposed to all sorts of viruses during their lifetime, and so they should keep going to school and infecting each other. Then, that contributes to herd immunity, which means after about four weeks at the most, the elderly people could start joining their family because then the virus would have been extinguished.”
Wittkowski’s take home message is, while Covid-19 may put a small minority of people at risk who should be protected, it does NOT pose a threat to the vast majority of people who should go about their normal lives and be allowed to develop natural herd immunity. Get the children back in school and playing together.
If 80% of people are immune and somebody has a virus and is infectious, it will be very difficult for that infectious person to find somebody who is still susceptible, not immune. And therefore, this person will not infect anybody else and therefore we won’t have the disease spreading. That is herd immunity”
Bill Gates opposed to natural immunity
Bill Gates is determined however, to prevent natural immunity so he can mandate his new vaccine(s) for everyone. Rosemary Frei nails it in this important article that shows Bill Gates doesn’t want people to acquire immunity to COVID-19. Rather, Bill prefers that we suffer the ‘economic pain’ of lockdown in order to prevent us from acquiring natural immunity. Natural immunity gets in the way of vaccinating everyone.
“We don’t want to have a lot of recovered people […] To be clear, we’re trying – through the shut-down in the United States – to not get to one percent of the population infected. We’re well below that today, but with exponentiation, you could get past that three million [people or approximately one percent of the U.S. population being infected with COVID-19 and the vast majority recovering]. I believe we will be able to avoid that with having this economic pain.”
In her latest compelling article, Covid-19 Meltdown and Pharmas’ Big Money Win, Barbara Loe Fisher delves into the many disturbing angles of this epic viral/political war unleashed on humanity, the havoc caused by the Gates & Fauci lockdown policy and the economic spinoffs spawned by the pandemic.
Covid-19 has sparked the hottest new market in town – vaccine development. A staggering number of coronavirus vaccines are under development right now with astronomical piles of money being thrown at it. Gates is in the thick of it along with his sidekick Tony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). Both are on record stating they don’t want people developing natural immunity.
“Now, I hope we don’t have so many people infected that we actually have that herd immunity, but I think it would have to be different than it is right now”, says Fauci.
Yes indeed, natural immunity would certainly disrupt their ‘vaccinate everything that moves’ game plan. In this video Gates says,
“Eventually, what we’ll have to have is certificates of who is a recovered person, who’s a vaccinated person, because you don’t want people moving around the world where you’ll have some countries that won’t have it under control…”
The Gates foundation has invested tens of $billions in vaccine development which includes a decades long vicious propaganda war against anyone questioning vaccine safety. Gates’ ‘decade of vaccines’ from 2010-20 captured the global media and social media giants that have demonized and ruthlessly censored the ‘vaccine risk aware’ movement comprised mostly of vaccine injured families trying to protect their children and the basic human right to informed consent and exemption rights. This timeline of articles explores the massive influence and control with which the Gates’ empire manipulates global health and vaccine policies.
In this article Canadian medical journalist, Celeste McGovern investigates the upcoming vaccine and microchip technologies Gates is funding.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. exposes the Gates/WHO agenda in this article listing their deadly vaccine experiments in the developing world. Kennedy explains,
“In 2010, when Gates committed $10 billion to the WHO, he said “We must make this the decade of vaccines.” A month later, Gates said in a TED Talk that new vaccines “could reduce population.” And, four years later, in 2014, Kenya’s Catholic Doctors Association accused the WHO of chemically sterilizing millions of unwilling Kenyan women with a “tetanus” vaccine campaign.
Throwing some cold water on all this frantic vaccine development, Australian vaccine developer Professor Ian Frazer, creator of the HPV (Gardasil) vaccine, told a news agency that despite 100 different teams around the world now working on covid-19 vaccines, they don’t yet have a model of how to attack the virus. He said,
It’s ‘tricky’…The wrong vaccine could make things worse so we have to be very selective about what part of the virus we want to attack.”
More scandal and speculation about Covid-19
In the meantime, more scandal has erupted. Breaking news from the Daily Mail says that under Fauci’s directive,
“The US government gave a $3.7 million grant to the Wuhan lab at center of coronavirus leak scrutiny and was performing experiments on bats from the caves where the disease is believed to have originated.”
Then in this article, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. writes,
“Fauci’s studies alarmed scientists around the globe who complained, according to a December 2017 NY Times article, that ‘these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic.’ Dr. Marc Lipsitch of the Harvard School of Public Health’s Communicable Disease Center told the Times that Dr. Fauci’s NIAID experiments “have given us some modest scientific knowledge and done almost nothing to improve our preparedness for pandemic, and yet risked creating an accidental pandemic.”
At Truth in Media, independent journalist Ben Swann discusses the implications of US funding of coronavirus research at Chinese lab:
“In October 2014, following a series of federal laboratory mishaps that narrowly missed releasing these deadly engineered viruses, President Obama ordered the halt to all federal funding for Fauci’s dangerous experiments. Fauci’s studies alarmed scientists around the globe who complained, according to a December 2017 NY Times article, that “these researchers risk creating a monster germ that could escape the lab and seed a pandemic.”
Then in this stunning statement by Dr. Luc Montagnier, the man who discovered the HIV virus back in 1983, says that after careful analysis with a bio-mathematician colleague, they’ve concluded that Covid-19 is a man-made, manipulated virus that was accidentally released from a lab in Wuhan in the last quarter of 2019: Montagnier defends the work of earlier investigators who showed that,
“this coronavirus genome contained sequences of the HIV virus (AIDS virus), but they were forced to withdraw their findings as the pressure from the mainstream was too great.”
According to Montagnier, the altered elements of Covid-19 will be eliminated as it spreads. He says,
“Nature does not accept any molecular tinkering, it will eliminate these unnatural changes and even if nothing is done, things will get better, but unfortunately after many deaths.”
The Trudeau/Tam Scam
Theresa Tam, Canada’s chief public health officer and longtime loyal servant of the WHO, serves on multiple international committees and related organizations that dictate global health policies. It seems her main job right now is to make sure that Trudeau obeys the WHO/Gates lockdown policy until the new Covid-19 vaccine arrives in 18 months.
Molly Chan, author of a probing analysis of Dr. Tam’s career thinks it’s evident from her background that,
“Theresa Tam works with the world’s most powerful globalist entities that have tremendous say in how the world deals with disease and immunization. This power enables them to have a grip on the entire planet, and to decide which measures are put into place to control the behaviour of people in any event they choose to cause a panic over. With COVID-19, we have a perfect example of how the decisions of this small group of people can lead to global hysteria and unprecedented societal changes.”
Molly Chan asks important questions on Tam’s career and extensive influence;
“Does this make Theresa Tam a puppet or master? How is it possible to not follow WHO recommendations, when you’re the one making them? She is on powerful committees!”
Considering the multiple numerous high-level positions Dr. Tam holds on the international stage, we must ask whether Tam’s first loyalty is to the wellbeing of Canadians or to the globalist policies so generously funded by Gates and Big Pharma?
Chan dubs Tam as the ‘Queen of Vaccine’ and explains,
“convened public health leaders and parents to collaborate on the effort to shut down any hint of anti-vaccine thought. Governments, including Canada and the U.S. are also working with social media companies to remove vaccine misinformation and promote scientific literacy. She wants to make sure that people are not allowed to publicly say anything against vaccinations, and establish them as just a normal part of life, no questions asked.”
While flexing her expansive influences, it seems a ‘no brainer’ that Theresa Tam has been instrumental in controlling the CBC’s narrative about the need to snuff out ‘vaccine hesitancy’ which includes the ruthless censorship of any voices that would question vaccine safety in mainstream media.
Tam is accused of “total incompetence” in having botched the Canadian response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Tam has failed miserably, putting political correctness, and virtue-signalling lecturing ahead of doing her job. She couldn’t grasp the situation in time, and when she grasped the seriousness of it was far too late to stop it.”
The Toronto Sun’s cutting review of Theresa Tam’s incompetence says,
“Our country is now run by ‘healthcrats’. Dr. Theresa Tam is the Healthcrat who runs the federal government. Her record on being wrong is spotless.”
Was Tam asleep at the switch or did she deliberately fail to take early action when people started arriving in Canada from areas where the virus was already circulating? This resulted in it taking off and spreading across the country months ago. In the UK, by the time the lockdowns were imposed, it’s estimated that 50% or more of the UK population had already been exposed or infected by covid-19 and had already developed immunity to the virus. It just might be the case that the same has happened in Canada.
In a recent interview in Chatelaine magazine, Tam bashes vaccine resistors and accuses them of causing measles outbreaks. Her cryptic statement, “I always think we do a really good job, when no one knows what we’re doing”, clues us in to our federal health agency’s lack of transparency and inability to provide crucial epidemiological data during this crisis.
All the above and more should be required reading for our Prime Minister to jolt him out of his hang dog subservience to WHO’s destructive pandemic policies and a predator billionaire’s agenda. It’s glaringly obvious that Prime Minister Trudeau needs a ‘second opinion’ from independent scientists. Such a group led by Dr. Amir Attaran, a biomedical scientist, a lawyer, and a professor in the Faculty of Law and the School of Epidemiology and Public Health at the University of Ottawa, has already declared their willingness to help sort out the mess our government has got us into.
Lest we forget the lessons of history
Added to Trudeau’s reading list is this historic perspective by Vera Sharav, a Holocaust survivor and founder of the Alliance for Human Research Protection. She examines how Gates’ table top ‘Event 201’ pandemic exercise last October set the stage for how the coronavirus pandemic would be handled. It predicted the pandemic would end ONLY after an effective vaccine had been brought to market. Is it a coincidence that the coronavirus pandemic was unleashed just weeks after Gates’ pandemic ‘war games’ rehearsal and is now playing out as a real life Orwellian lockdown scenario threatened to continue until the new vaccine arrives?
Sharav also delves into Gates’ vast business ventures related to enhancing pharmaceutical products and vaccines. His ID2020 is a digital ID program aimed at identifying 1 billion + people lacking identity documents. Also in development are several ID devices that people could be forced to have implanted to identify their vaccine and birth-control status.
Sharav’s insight into history reminds us of the rise of fascist regimes resulting in the massive loss of lives in world war II. She warns how uncontrolled excessive philanthropy leads to the destruction of our most cherished human rights and what is at stake;
- Consider what is at stake if we don’t resist the blatant attempt at a power grab by the plutocrats with Bill Gates in the forefront. Their utilitarian business ethics extend to utilization of Eugenics’ nefarious methods!
- The elitist agenda of Eugenics was the catalyst for the alliance between the medical establishment and the Nazi regime. That evil partnership designed and executed the only medical Holocaust in history.
- American jurists who formulated the Nuremberg Code in 1947, sought to prevent such a grotesque perversion of medicine from ever happening again.
Vera Sharav reminds us that;
“The foremost, inviolable principle of the Nuremberg Code is the absolute right of every human being to voluntary, informed consent. It is crucial that we preserve this human right at all cost.
Those who seek to abrogate the individual right to informed consent seek to overthrow democracy and to establish a totalitarian regime; this time, a totally technologically-controlled regime.”
Let Our People Go!
If this lockdown is an exercise in testing the public’s willingness to obey government dictates based on grossly flawed epidemiological modeling, lack of data, fear and unconstitutional decrees by our minority government, then it is a resounding success. It shows us that no matter how flimsy the evidence, how glaring the lack of definitive medical data and statistics, how devastating the impact on families and society, when government flexes its ‘emergency powers’, we are all too willing to go along with it.
Given the controversy surrounding the original Imperial College probability modelling that drove lockdowns, followed by drastic downgrading of these mathematical models, a re-evaluation of lockdown policies is now overdue. The social distancing, self-isolation, the almost complete shut down of society and the economy are based on disease modelling speculations that are completely divorced from previous accumulated global pandemic experience, and absent any justifiable data. As aptly stated by this U.K journalist, these are,
“measures that are astonishing by the standards of wartime, never mind peacetime.”
Another media analyst put it bluntly,
“This isn’t complicated. The models don’t work. The hospitals are empty. WHY ARE WE STILL TALKING ABOUT INDEFINITE LOCKDOWNS?”
Our hospitals are NOT overwhelmed by a tsunami of desperately ill patients. Many hospitals are eerily empty with nurses reporting their shifts have been cancelled, elective surgeries are all cancelled, and most normal hospital business has ground to a halt.
Spring is here and the outdoors calls. It is cruel and inhumane to force lockdown on an entire population when we all need time outdoors in the fresh spring air and sunshine. Gardens need planting and farmers their crops. Children especially after a long winter, deserve to be outdoors playing with their friends in the sunshine to boost their health and dispel viruses. Everyone needs fresh air and time outdoors to replenish wellbeing on all levels.
It’s time to retire the ‘covid’ cops harassing and intimidating people out for a stroll in the park, ticketing them for not adhering to strict new social distancing rules.
Rage is rising among the people that lockdown has gone too far. It’s TIME TO END IT! It is time to LET OUR PEOPLE GO!
Updated May 1, 2020