An outbreak of 12 cases of measles, mostly in one high school in the St. John area, was all that was needed for New Brunswick’s Education Minister, Dominic Cardy to launch a mandatory vaccination campaign via the introduction of Bill 39. If passed, Bill 39 would end parental decision making about vaccines and would eliminate personal belief exemptions based on conscience or religion which have been in place for over 30 years. Only hard to obtain medical exemptions would be allowed as recently happened in California, New York and Maine.
Based on measles outbreak history in Canada and elsewhere, we now know that the measles component of the MMR vaccine wanes in a few years, and teens in high school are the most likely age group to get measles if they are exposed, even if they are fully vaccinated. Measles outbreaks today occur in fully vaccinated populations because of vaccine failure, not because of the failure to vaccinate.
When asked how many of the 12 measles cases were fully vaccinated, NB health officials defiantly refused to disclose this information to the Legislative Committee, citing medical privacy rights.
When Bill 39 passed first reading on June 7, 2019 it triggered a tsunami of protest from across Canada. As a result, and to the credit of the New Brunswick government, the Standing Committee on Law Amendments convened a three day hearing from August 27-29 to give the public and other sectors an opportunity to present information on the merits of the amendment.
New Brunswickers made a tremendous effort to educate their legislators about the reality of vaccine reactions and injuries. They invited expert medical, scientific and legal witnesses to present testimonies to the legislators. Parents gave compelling and heartfelt testimonies on the devastating vaccine injuries their children have suffered.
A mother five children spoke of how vaccines had injured her older children. Despite their deteriorating health, she continued to vaccinate them because she was told by doctors it was the right and best thing to do to protect her children. She believed in the benefit of vaccines. But there came a point when after every round of vaccines, and after which their health issues kept worsening, she could no longer submit her children to them. She then decided not to expose her younger children to the risks and refused to vaccinate them.
“We parent with the care that children require. Of course, I am going to do what is best and in their best interest and for their safety. Also, I care about the community around me, and I have proved that by vaccinating my children in the first case. That is what I did. But there comes a point where, for my personal family—and I speak only for myself—we could not offer up our children anymore as a sacrifice for herd immunity. We could not do it. I could not even offer up my daughter to save my son’s life.”
Read VCC Vice President, Ted Kuntz’s moving presentation:
“Bill 39 effectively gives the state the power to decide what is injected into our body and our children. This legislation eliminates the medical ethic of informed consent, removes therapeutic choice, denies a parent’s right to make medical decisions for their children, disregards bodily sovereignty, invites discrimination, and undermines a child’s right to a public education. Bill 39 also removes a critical mechanism of accountability – voluntary choice. The human right to self-autonomy and bodily integrity is arguably the most important right we have. I invite you to contemplate the implications when an individual or a parent is no longer able to dissent from submitting to an invasive medical procedure that carries the risk of permanent injury and death for themselves and their children.”
Constitutional lawyer James Kitchen’s superb Brief to the NB committee is a “must read”:
“By demanding—as a precondition to accessing basic government services—that the bodies of children be injected with substances which they do not necessarily need, which their parents do not want or willingly consent to and which are potentially harmful, Bill 39 is an egregious intrusion on the bodily autonomy, security and liberty of parents and children. Such a significant breach of fundamental interests regarding what does and does not enter one’s body is only remotely acceptable in extreme or emergency circumstances.”
Dr. Bob Sears Testimony to NB legislators – text starts on page 57 of the August 27th testimony.
“What is scientifically irrefutable is that the whooping cough vaccine does not reduce whooping cough cases for the reasons that I just talked about. The FDA did a study in 2013, which I will give you, that clearly demonstrates that the vaccine only makes you feel less sick. You still catch the germs, stay contagious, and pass the infection on to others just as easily as those who are not vaccinated. If you are not vaccinated and catch the disease, you generally will only catch it once. If you are vaccinated and catch the disease, you can keep catching it later on and keep spreading it around. I quote from the study: The observation that the vaccine fails to prevent colonization or transmission is a plausible explanation for the resurgence of pertussis.This is from our own FDA. The CDC agrees and says: Unvaccinated kids are not the driving force behind these large pertussis outbreaks.”
Dr. Meryl Nass’ Testimony to NB legislators:
“I am a veteran of the vaccine war in the US, and today I feel compelled to speak about what I saw in that war. Legislators were forced to change their votes to revoke vaccine exemptions and rescind the historic right to consent to medical procedures. The vaccine war is a dirty war, in which platitudes about protecting the most vulnerable are invoked by the same pharmaceutical companies that paid $2.7 billion in criminal penalties in the US between 2012 and 2015. The vaccine industry generates enormous profits (estimated 10-40%), benefits from a government-guaranteed market, and receives almost total liability protection. No other industry can rival these benefits. And this industry’s rapacious desire to grow and guarantee its Canadian market is the reason we are here today.” Visit Meryll Nass’ website where you can read some of the interesting articles she’s written over the years: https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2019/09/why-are-legislatures-imposing-vaccine.html
The text and audio recordings of the full Legislative Committee proceedings and additional rich collection of testimonies and videos can be found on VCC’s New Brunswick Mandates – Take Action page.
Take-Aways From New Brunswick
VCC Vice President, Ted Kuntz shared these important ‘take-aways’ from the New Brunswick legislative hearings which he attended for the full three days. It is a road map of where we are and our way forward in this struggle to preserve our most basic human rights now threatened by a global vaccine agenda.
We are all tasked with doing the hard work needed to stop the mandatory vaccination agenda orchestrated at the highest international levels of the UN, the World Health Organization and in which myriad NGOs (non-governmental organizations), governments and mainstream media, now fully owned and controlled by the pharmaceutical industry, all participate in. It is a world wide dragnet gearing up to impose vaccine mandates on all citizens.
“Politicians are uniformed and misinformed. Don’t assume they know anything beyond that’s published by mainstream media, which doesn’t tell the truth about vaccine injury. In the weeks just prior to introducing Bill 39, New Brunswick legislators were intensely lobbied by the vaccine industry. The vaccine industry is working hard – of that there is no doubt!
The NB Legislative Committee was not prepared for what they heard. They thought they could have a couple of days of public input and then go on their way and pass the legislation. We brought in experts to testify on the lack of vaccine safety science, and ineffectiveness in preventing transmission of infection. More than 20 parents of vaccine injured children came to tell their story.
We watched the MLAs wake up. They went from disinterest, to concern to anger in three days. They got a crash course on vaccine injury and industry deception. It was like the Wizard of Oz. We pulled back the curtain and revealed that it’s all smoke and mirrors.
The “experts” from the medical industry did us a favor. They were incompetent, unprofessional and ignorant. They couldn’t or wouldn’t answer the most basic questions like:
a. How many of the 12 cases of measles in NB were in vaccinated children?
b. Do vaccine contain aborted fetal tissue?
c. Are vaccines tested for safety using double blind, inert placebo controlled studies?
d. Are vaccines tested to the same level of safety as other pharmaceutical drugs?
e. Will this legislation violate the Canadian Charter of Rights?
The Way Forward