By Ted Kuntz
The argument made for denying a public education to children who are selectively vaccinated or unvaccinated is the risk they pose to the immune-compromised who can’t be vaccinated. It’s a heart-warming story motivated out of compassion for those children who are medically fragile. Or is it?
If we take these pro-mandate advocates at their word, then it would follow that we also cannot allow any child or adult to attend our public schools and daycares who isn’t fully immunized. This means not just being vaccinated, but rather genuinely immunized against infectious diseases.
So, this begs the question(s):
If mandate proponents aren’t demanding all of these individuals be excluded from schools, daycares and other public spaces, then one has to wonder whether the transmission of disease really is their primary concern.
It’s Not About Medical Risk
I think we all know the answers to these questions. None of the unvaccinated immune-compromised children are denied access to a public education. None of the non-responders to vaccination are denied a public education. None of the significant number of children and adults whose immunity has waned are denied a public education. We know there is no required titre testing to determine who is actually immune and who is not. And there is no acknowledgement given, much less consideration of the viral shedding from the recently vaccinated. A child can be vaccinated with a live virus vaccine and be back in their classroom within minutes.
This means that the restrictions being imposed upon selectively vaccinated or unvaccinated children is not about medical risk. It is not about the transmission of disease. It is not about the safety of the public space. If it really was about medical risk and the transmission of disease, these other unvaccinated and unimmunized children and adults, as well as those recently vaccinated with live virus vaccines would also be deprived of a public education and access to public spaces. But that will never happen.
What is obvious, if we dare to think, is that vaccine mandates for school attendance is really about punishment for challenging vaccine ideology. These mandates are not about making the public space safe, but rather are a crude and heartless means to coerce families to vaccinate against their wishes by creating hardship and threatening the future of their children.
When you examine the justification given for eroding parental rights, medical rights and legal rights, it isn’t what they claim it is. It isn’t about medical risk. It isn’t about compassion for the medically fragile. This is the sham of the medical industry. This is the deception of the vaccine lobbyists. They purport to be about health and compassion, but it isn’t health they are concerned about. It isn’t about medical risk. It isn’t compassion for the immune-compromised. It’s all about power, control, and the removal of the right of parents to say no to unwanted and unsafe medical products.
This is a corporation that has been captured by greed, arrogance and willful ignorance. This is a corporation that purports to have compassion for the vulnerable but has no compassion for the vaccine injured or those made medically fragile as a result of vaccination. This is all about selling vaccine products, with or without your consent. Period.
So, when a politician, medical professional, or vaccine industry lobbyist tells you that school mandates are necessary to protect the vulnerable, let them know that you see through their fraud and deception. Tell them that if they really had compassion for the vulnerable, they would have compassion for the vaccine injured. Tell them that ‘the emperor has no clothes’ and you see their naked greed and callous disregard. Tell them you do not consent and never will.
Printable PDF here.