Home Vaccine Choice Canada - Position Papers
The use of mandates for any medical intervention is abhorrent. Forcing a medical treatment upon an unwilling patient is deplorable in a society that purportedly honours individual rights and bodily sovereignty. Whether to accept or reject a medical treatment should always be a choice.
Vaccinations are no exception. Except they are.
For some reason we have been convinced that vaccines are an exception to the rule of bodily sovereignty and medical choice. That informed consent, which requires the choice be voluntary and without coercion or intimidation, is not applicable to the injection of foreign substances into our body.
And while every health professional agrees to a ‘Code of Conduct’ that recognizes a patient’s right to informed consent and bodily sovereignty, these Codes of Conduct seem to be of no effect when the medical product is labelled a “vaccine”.
The mainstream media and pro-vaccine advocates in public health and government would have you believe we are at serious risk of a measles epidemic as a result of “vaccine hesitancy”. There is no doubt there is a significant increase in parents questioning the vaccine narrative. Recent polls reveal that 1 in 6 parents say they are “really against” vaccinating their children, a four-fold increase from 2019. There is also a significant increase in the number of Canadians who oppose mandatory childhood vaccination and say that it should be a parents’ decision. The question is whether the risk to the health and safety of our children is “vaccine hesitancy”, or the risk is blind faith in the vaccine industry?
What you discover when you examine the vaccine safety literature is that the safety of the vaccine program has not been established using sound, rigorous, independent science.
When public officials make the unqualified statement that vaccines are “safe and effective”, they are either misinformed or are not being openly transparent about the status of vaccine safety science.
Given that vaccines are a product given to healthy children, the level of safety testing ought to be even more rigorous than is required with all other pharmaceutical products. This is not the case. The safety testing of vaccine products is less rigorous, incomplete, and protocols appear to have been designed to obscure identifying long-term adverse effects of vaccines.
1. There is no COVID emergency for children. Children with healthy immune systems can manage COVID infection with relative ease.
2. Most children have natural immunity due to prior exposure. Studies show natural immunity is superior to vaccine-induced immunity.
3. The CV-19 vaccines are not actually vaccines. These products do not prevent infection or transmission.
Governments have declared their intention to inject every human on the planet with experimental COVID biological products regardless of risks. This callous disregard for risk is evident with the recent decision to market COVID-19 products to children ages 5–11 years.
The scientific evidence is clear that children are not at risk from COVID-19; nor are they transmitters of the disease. The risk-benefit analysis confirms the risk from these injected biological products significantly exceeds any benefit.
Governments have made changes to long-standing risk management protocols. The Government of British Columbia recently removed the requirement to consult with a Program Manager or Risk Management Consultant when obtaining consent from children 12 years of age and younger.1
To act with the assumption that children as young as five years of age could be capable of providing informed consent to these COVID biological products is reckless, unethical, and predatory.
Key Points:
• Medical Tyranny in Canada – They are Coming to Inject Our Children with COVID-19 Shots
• The Safety Testing of All Childhood Vaccines and COVID-19 Shots is Sub-Standard
• Canadian Government and Public Health Policies are Not Lawful
• COVID-19 Injections – High Risk of Life-long Injury/Death
• Canada’s Public Health System – Complicit in a Catastrophic Epidemic of Chronic Illness
• How Can We Protect Ourselves and Our Loved Ones?
Key Points:
• Our rights and freedoms are being egregiously violated by our governments.
• Few of our elected representatives are standing up to defend our Charter rights.
• Service to the Party has superseded the responsibility to serve the people.
• We need to elect candidates who will defend our Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Given the discontent with our political system and the lack of real choice available, a common question is – which party should we vote for? We propose this is the wrong question.
A better question is –Which Principles Should We Vote for?
Key Points:
Canadians are being coerced to accept an experimental medical device. This is an egregious violation of medical ethics and our fundamental and inherent rights and freedoms.
There is no ethical, medical, or legal justification to discriminate against those who choose not to partake in this human experiment.
Exemptions are not a viable recourse to avoid mandates, coercion, and medical tyranny.
Canadians already have the inherent right, which is constitutionally protected in our Charter of Rights and Freedoms, to refuse any unwanted medical intervention. We do not require an exemption or any other documentation to exercise this right.
It is the duty of all Canadians to stand up and stand strong to defend our inherent rights and freedoms.
The University of Waterloo, Wilfred Laurier University, the University of Guelph, the University of Toronto, Western University, Seneca College, Fanshaw College and other institutions of post-secondary education are imposing unconstitutional vaccine mandates as a condition of enrolment in the full university/college experience.
The policies of these institutions are clearly intended to coerce students to accept the use of an experimental medical treatment. These actions reveal their complete disregard for Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, codes of ethical medicine and scientific research, and international agreements on human rights such as the Nuremberg Code and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Researchers and physicians across the world are ringing the alarm bells warning that COVID shots may cause life-long injury and death, infertility, miscarriages, birth defects, and may alter human genetics.
VAERS data released July 16, 2021, by the CDC showed a total of 463,457 reports of adverse events from all age groups following COVID vaccines, including 10,991 deaths and 48,385 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and July 9, 2021. It is also acknowledged that less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported indicating that the true number of injuries and deaths may be 100X these numbers.
The evidence is clear that COVID injections are the most dangerous “vaccines” ever produced. More deaths have occurred following the COVID shots than the total number of deaths from all vaccines combined over a 30-year period.
In response to the public’s legitimate concerns pertaining to the safety of the rushed-to-market COVID vaccines and the ‘interim use’ authorization granted by Health Canada prior to the completion of Phase III safety trials, the Government of Canada announced its intention to create a national vaccine injury compensation program.
While the members of Vaccine Choice Canada fully support and have long advocated for a system of compensation for Canadians injured and killed by vaccine products, we declare that we have significant reservations with a system of compensation that is not also a system of accountability.
These programs, however, are fraught with difficulties, inadequacies, limitations, are often funded by taxpayers rather than the industry, and fall far short of being fair, just, accessible and accountable. In fact, there is evidence that these programs which fail to hold industry accountable for harm caused by their products have resulted in decreased public health protection.
Any action that would require Canadians to produce a ‘Vaccine Immunity Passport’ or similar documentation to pursue life, liberty and happiness is unconstitutional and a deeply disturbing violation of our Canadian Charter of rights and freedoms.
No Medical Justification
Just as the various governments in Canada have failed to provide verifiable medical and scientific evidence to warrant the unprecedented lockdowns and other measures instated in response to the purported COVID pandemic, any requirement to produce documentation of COVID vaccine compliance is unjustified and without medical or scientific merit.