The Mature Minor Doctrine in Canada

Did You Know?

A child who is a mature minor may make their own health care decisions independent of their parents’ or guardians’ wishes.

In B.C., there is no set age when a child is considered capable to give consent. 

https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/healthlinkbc-files/infants-act-mature-minor-consent-and-immunization

It’s important that parents are aware of, and understand the implications of, The Mature Minor Doctrine, also known as the Infants Act. These policies were introduced by all provincial governments in Canada to enable children under the legal age of consent (18 years) to access birth control, and later abortion services, without the knowledge or consent of their parents.

 

The scope of this doctrine has been expanded in recent years to enable minor children to receive vaccinations and other life-altering treatments, including gender-altering counselling, puberty blocking hormones, and mutilation surgery without the knowledge or consent of their parents. Discussion is currently underway in our federal parliament to include medically assisted dying (MAID) as a medical decision that mature minors can choose.

 

The age of a ‘mature minor’ varies by province with many provinces having no specified age.

 

In many provinces a minor is automatically considered a “mature minor” at age sixteen. When a child is deemed a “mature minor”, parental/legal guardian consent is not required, and consent given by a mature minor cannot be overturned by parents/legal guardians.

Furthermore, a minor under the age of 16 is capable of giving consent to a medical treatment if an attending medical practitioner determines that the minor understands the nature and consequences of a medical treatment.

 

In Ontario, the Health Care Consent Act requires that appropriate consent be obtained before a medical treatment, such as vaccination, is provided. A person does not have to be a certain age in order to be considered capable of providing his or her own consent. The law states that a person is capable of consenting to medical treatment if he/she is able to understand the information regarding the medical treatment, including the benefits, risks and side effects, and the consequences of consenting or not consenting to the treatment. The responsibility for determining if a minor is capable of consenting to a medical treatment rests with the health professional providing the treatment.

 

Children as young as nine years have been deemed by health professionals mature enough to make life-altering medical decisions without the knowledge or consent of their parents. In recent years, the deemed age of a ‘mature minor’ has gotten younger, even as the medical decisions have gotten more complex.

VCC’s Position

 

VCC defends the right and responsibility of parents to make decisions for their minor children under the age of consent (18 years). We believe that policies such as the Mature Minor Doctrine undermine parental authority and erode the integrity of the family unit.

 

With regards to vaccination, we hold that vaccination is too complex a medical decision to permit minor children to consent without the guidance of their parents or legal guardians. Children do not have the maturity and life experience to weigh the potential harm and benefits of a medical treatment, and to consider the contraindications to vaccination which may include individual and family medical history; prior history of adverse reactions; emerging scientific evidence; and natural immunity due to a previous exposure, which a child may not be aware of.

 

We hold that the Mature Minor Doctrine/Infants Act undermines parental authority and their right and responsibility to make medical decisions for their children.

 

We have also found that our medical authorities have acted inconsistently in that they have deemed a child mature enough to consent to vaccination, but not mature enough when the child refuses vaccination. This would suggest their basis for determining maturity is ideological rather than evidence based.

 

The Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled that providing medical treatment to minors without parental consent can only be done in emergency situations and that the use of the mature minor doctrine is not to be exaggerated”. Vaccination is not an emergency, and as such, parents must always be involved in the decision.

 

In spite of this ruling, vaccine clinics are increasingly located in our children’s schools and children are being vaccinated at school without the knowledge or consent of their parents. We believe vaccine clinics in schools undermines parental authority and subjects children to unacceptable coercion from school administrators and teachers, public health authorities, and peer pressure. It is the position of VCC that vaccine clinics do not belong in our schools.

 

Vaccination is a complex medical decision that needs to involve the parents, and ought to be considered in discussion with one’s primary health care practitioner who knows the medical history of the child and the family. Public health nurses administering vaccinations in schools do not have sufficient knowledge of the child’s medical or family history to be administering these life altering medications to our children without parental knowledge and consent. They also have a financial and ideological conflict of interest.

Government of Canada

Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child and Children’s Participatory Rights in Canada

 

F. PROCEEDINGS ABOUT HEALTH CARE

In Canada, children’s decision-making about health care issues occurs within a complicated legal framework. First, there is the common law “mature minor” doctrine. Generally, parents are entitled to make treatment decisions on their children’s behalf. The mature minor doctrine, however, allows children who are sufficiently mature to make their own treatment decisions. Second, there is provincial and territorial legislation governing consent to medical treatment. These statutes often provide a specific age at which children are presumed competent to consent to treatment. Third, there is child protection legislation. These provincial and territorial statutes allow a child protection agency to apply to a court to order treatment for a child where either the child or parent is refusing to consent. Finally, there are cases interpreting how these sources of law interact and which rules will ultimately govern health care decision-making for children.

Provincial definitions of a minor

In Canada, the definition of a minor child varies according to province.

 

1. British Columbia: Person under 19 years.

2. Alberta: Person under 18 years.

3. Saskatchewan: Unmarried person under 16 years.

4. Manitoba: Person under 18 years.

5. Ontario: Person under 18 years.

6. Quebec: Person under 18 years.

7. Nova Scotia: Person under 19 years.

8. New Brunswick: Person under 19 years.

9. Newfoundland: Person under 16 years (youth defined as a person who is 16 years or older, but under the age of 18)

10. Prince Edward Island: Person under 18 years.

11. Northwest Territories: Person under 19 years.

12. Yukon: Person under 19 years.

13. Nunavut: Person under 19 years.

Definitions by Province & Territories

What is Informed Consent?

Informed consent is a process in which a patient or client is given essential information prior to partaking in a medical procedure or treatment or participating in a clinical trial. The basis of informed consent is that all individuals have free will, and thus the right to accept or reject any medical treatment.

 

According to the Canadian Medical Protective Association (CMPA), this principle is applicable not only to surgical operations, but also to all forms of medical treatment and diagnostic procedures that involve intentional interference with the person.

 

Informed consent is considered the most important principle of an ethical medical system and the principle is found in the Code of Ethics of every health profession and has both moral and legal implications for those administering a medical treatment.

Informed consent is considered the most important principle of an ethical medical system.

Informed Consent – The Foundation of an Ethical Medical System  

By Ted Kuntz

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/about-vaccines/informed-consent-the-foundation-of-an-ethical-medical-system

Uninformed Consent – A Metador Films Picture

By Vaccine Choice Canada & Librti.com

https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/media/uninformed-consent

VCC Disclaimer

The contents of this website are for informational purposes only. Opinions expressed should not be construed as medical advice.

The particulars of any person’s concerns and circumstances should be discussed with a qualified health care practitioner prior to making any decision which may affect the health and welfare of that person or anyone under his or her care.

Read our full disclaimer here.

 

×