Our Justices, whether in Family, Provincial, Superior, Appellate, or the Supreme Court of Canada seem intent
on violating the fundamentals of law and the body of decisions rendered over centuries of legal precedents.
While the choice of medical treatment, and or, refusal has been recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada as a Charter right, this fundamental right is being ignored and consciously violated in these times of Covid-19.
This is no more evident than in decisions rendered over the last three years pertaining to the various governments response to COVID. This to the extreme such that the Supreme Court of Canada did not view it important enough to grant permission to appeal a case where a person is to die from not receiving a vital organ transplant because the person exercised his or her constitutional right to refuse the Covid-19 injection prior to the life-saving operation.
Never before have justices presiding in a court of law systematically deferred to government dictates without the need to provide evidence that the violations of fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadians are demonstrably justified. The rote response of justices has been to declare ‘judicial notice’. Facts judicially noticed are not proven by evidence under oath; nor are they tested by cross-examination. This is at odds with Section 1 of the Charter that puts the burden of proof onto the government.
This means our courts are accepting, without proof, whatever the government deems necessary to address COVID, notwithstanding evidence, science or medicine. Our Canadian courts are no longer impartial. Our appointed judges have forgotten that they exist to protect, not deny, our rights.
Vaccine Choice Canada initiated two legal actions in response to government overreach and violations of fundamental Charter rights and freedoms.
In 2019, we launched an action against the Ontario government for their threat of removing a self-declared right to exempt children from vaccines in the public school system. This action was in response to years of government threats, intimidation, coercion and fraud against parents who exercised their right to informed consent with regards to childhood vaccinations. Vaccine Choice Canada (VCC), et. Al. (and others) v. Her Majesty the Queen, et.al. (and others) Ontario Superior Court # CV-00629810-0000
In July 2020, Vaccine Choice Canada launched legal action against the governments of Canada and Ontario for their egregious violations with respect to their Covid-19 measures. VCC was the first organization to call out the global effort to deprive individual rights and sovereignty and to impose unsupported, unscientific and harmful measures upon Canadians. Vaccine Choice Canada (VCC), et. Al. (and others) v. Justin Trudeau, et.al. (and others) Ontario Superior Court # CV-20-00643451-0000
Some were critical of the length of the Statement of Claim in this matter. I assure you that this was a deliberate decision by VCC to put on the public record the coordinated effort to violate rights and freedoms of citizens globally by global organizations, as implemented by governments in Canada, measures which came from the global organizations. What was dismissed and deemed conspiracy theory has proven to be accurate and well founded.
There has also been criticism of the lengthy delay in having these matters brought before the courts.
There are a number of reasons for the delay. A significant reason is institutional delay. The time to set down such a motion in Ontario is 18 months or more.
The most important reason for the delay, however, is the state of law in Canada today.
The fact is that our courts are not respecting established law and precedents.
Our courts are not making decisions based on evidence, but rather on opinion, ideology, and politicking.
Our courts are not making impartial decisions.
What we have witnessed during the last three years is the demise of our legal system of oversight and accountability of government action.
Do we proceed as expeditiously as possible, knowing that our courts are captured and our likelihood of success remote? The risk being that we not only lose our opportunity to right the wrongs, but we potentially increase the harm by having unjustified defeat set precedents.
It is said that politics follows culture. The same is true for our judges.
There is substantive evidence that our judges, most especially our Supreme Court of Canada judges, have violated their independence from government and instead actively participated with government in determining government mandates in response to COVID.
This means the recent court proceedings are a mockery of the independence of the courts.
There is a growing awareness amongst Canadians of the deception and fraud committed by our governments and public health agencies under the guise of COVID. This awareness is shifting the culture such that our trust in government and regulatory institutions has declined dramatically. Blind trust in the benevolence of government is waning. More and more Canadians are asking the hard questions and expecting answers and accountability.
Hopefully this culture shift will also shift our justices.
We are scheduled to appear in court in January 2024.