It is a bold thing to say ‘research confirms’ when it comes to anything. The reason is that carefully selected research data can be used to support pretty much any argument or point of view, especially when you have numerous variables. And this is why so many people have fallen for the official ‘follow the science’ narrative which has been very good at manipulating data and how it is used to justify commercial or political interests.
The growing mass of data that is showing that natural immunity is more effective at protecting people, especially children, from COVID reinfection, has also been subject to, shall we say, ‘selective editing’ to influence public opinion. Yet it’s hard to deny the overall findings: Natural immunity is, on average, across age and time variables, more effective at preventing re-infection than the Covid vaccine or boosters. Plus, and perhaps most importantly, natural immunity doesn’t come with the horrific side-effects and risks of the vaccines, which are now recognized as being more dangerous than all other vaccines combined.
This then begs the question – why did almost every government and national health authority in the world invest vast sums of public money into the Covid vaccine program? Well, the obvious reason is exactly that – ‘vast sums of money’. Those kickbacks, commissions, fees and research grants percolated down throughout the political, corporate, social and even religious structures of every nation to ensure complete compliance – and obscene profits.
Now that we are able to step back from the fear-induced panic buying of vaccines, we need to objectively look at what the research is actually telling us about natural immunity, which very likely has a bearing on all vaccines not just the Covid mRNA ones. Several studies on this important topic have been published over the last few months and they are all confirming the same overall conclusion. Natural immunity provides better protection from reinfection of Covid.
The latest findings are from a comprehensive review and meta-analysis for numerous independent studies on natural immunity conducted prior to the end of September 2022 that was published by the Lancet. In total, 65 studies were included in the meta-analysis from 19 different countries making this a very robust study with minimal margin for error.
Dr. Vinay Prasad, an epidemiologist at the University of California, said that the paper made a “compelling case that we can effectively stop boosting average risk individuals (which includes most of us) who have had covid… Vaccine policy should have been different in people with prior illness.”
Yet public health officials in Canada have consistently and repeatedly said that vaccination is better than natural immunity and that the naturally immune should still get vaccinated despite the protection they have, irrespective of the risks. Bonnie Henry’s latest missive in British Columbia is confirmation of this statement.
this latest omnibus study is telling us that:
The truth is that humans have survived and thrived as a species because of our incredible ability to build and maintain natural immunity. This evolutionary capability allows us to assimilate new viruses into our biological make-up and therefore become stronger and more adaptive to our ever-changing environment. When we sub-contract that natural functionality to conveniently provided (and of course paid for) corporate solutions we lose the ability to adapt. Over time that actually develops weaknesses and vulnerabilities, which we will no longer have a natural ability to manage.
The lesson is that we should not forget the power of our own natural immunity which is specifically designed to handle things like viral outbreaks, and which, as a result, make us more resilient and healthier in the long run.
Once again, over time, the weakness and ‘unintended consequences’ of rushed vaccines eventually comes to light, and that, of course, is another lesson that we should all start to learn.
Alan Brough
Canada Health Alliance – www.canadahealthalliance.org
